SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
EXPLORE +
  • About infoDOCKET
  • Academic Libraries on LJ
  • Research on LJ
  • News on LJ
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Libraries
    • Academic Libraries
    • Government Libraries
    • National Libraries
    • Public Libraries
  • Companies (Publishers/Vendors)
    • EBSCO
    • Elsevier
    • Ex Libris
    • Frontiers
    • Gale
    • PLOS
    • Scholastic
  • New Resources
    • Dashboards
    • Data Files
    • Digital Collections
    • Digital Preservation
    • Interactive Tools
    • Maps
    • Other
    • Podcasts
    • Productivity
  • New Research
    • Conference Presentations
    • Journal Articles
    • Lecture
    • New Issue
    • Reports
  • Topics
    • Archives & Special Collections
    • Associations & Organizations
    • Awards
    • Funding
    • Interviews
    • Jobs
    • Management & Leadership
    • News
    • Patrons & Users
    • Preservation
    • Profiles
    • Publishing
    • Roundup
    • Scholarly Communications
      • Open Access

May 24, 2012 by Gary Price

Guest Post: Where is the “Big Data” for Libraries? by Matt Weaver

May 24, 2012 by Gary Price

Editors Note
Matt Weaver is the Web Librarian at Westlake Porter Public Library (Westlake, Ohio) and a board member for Library Renewal.
Matt is also a great friend and supporter of infoDOCKET. For example, just about daily he shares news items and new resources that we share with all of you.
Today, in his first guest post, Matt shares his thoughts about the first OverDrive “Big Data” report that was released about a month ago and that we shared (full text) the other day.
We look forward to sharing more from Matt in the future.

Guest Post: Where is the “Big Data” for Libraries?
by Matt Weaver

My first response in looking at this Big Data report is, this is not Big Data.
From my days as an indexer/abstractor for a business database company, one thing that I learned was that monthly reports are rarely of value. Snapshots offer no context for the data to be analyzed and no patterns/ trends can be determined in such a short time frame. But, if you were going to choose one month, why March and not January?
For my library, March marked a definite decline from the post-New Year boom. Hopefully future reports will offer data that is representative, useful etc.
Oh, and be made available to the libraries whose usage they represent.
You see, this report was written for publishers, ALA and libraries (UK), but “Content Partners” did not receive it (to my knowledge, anyway, my library did not). Libraries should be equal partners in these releases, because it’s our data. So, if Mr. Berners-Lee doesn’t mind, I’ll follow his lead and argue that libraries need to demand their data from Overdrive.
It’s not that we are without data entirely. Overdrive’s Content Reserve provides tools with a number of metrics. Reports are customizable and can show trends. They are great tools to have at our disposal. Overdrive’s report contains data that libraries cannot access via Content Reserve. As the source of these reports, each and every Overdrive customer should receive a copy.
For instance, there is a page that, as the Web Librarian, has particular interest, the Device Share page, which features a breakdown of site visits, page views and other data broken down by device. A local version of this would be valuable so that I could understand my mobile users. I also have had an active role in training staff and working with patrons, so having this data — and being able to monitor developments — would help us better prepare training materials and classes so that they are the most effective.
Overdrive’s discussion of cover views, page views etc. Maybe I’m revealing a gap in my knowledge, but in a system like Overdrive’s, is that data necessarily measures of user engagement? I thought page view data is more important when considering selling advertising on pages. So, that data is used to validate the company’s role as custodian of publishers’ content.
I know from working with patrons that the search/browse interface for ebooks/audiobooks is clunky, and search results get rather large, requiring more effort to find things that they would want to read, especially in the absence of many popular authors/titles since the loss of Penguin. Can that data possibly reflect the cumbersome nature of the interface?
I would like to see how many books patrons checked out/put on hold/added to the wish list. Given the average amount of time spent on the site of 9 minutes and 34 seconds looking at an average of 11.6 pages (page 2, Key Findings), I would be interested to learn how much of that
time was spent finding and choosing, and how much was on winnowing. How many people left OverDrive sites without selecting anything? I would like to see a breakdown of frequency of site visits: what percentage of users are frequent users, and how many have never returned.
We do not build Overdrive collections the way we do our print collections, seeking to make sure they rich, reflect a range of viewpoints, all of that first-semester library school stuff, right?
We do not have access to a broad enough range of content to do that. So, after massive changes in access in the past year or so, including Harper Collins, Penguin, Brilliance Audio, and Random House, we license content from what is proving to be a dwindling pool of resources.
Our administrative costs have not been adjusted, and particular publishers have significantly increased their costs. Having the tools to evaluate OverDrive is important, lest libraries find themselves “pot locked,” and bound to paying into a system, even if it doesn’t satisfy patron demand.
If this report truly “confirms the benefits that books and authors in library channels enjoy in terms of exposure and discovery to a highly desirable audience…” then let’s look at the entire audience. How do consortia fair in this environment?
Personally, I think this report holds a modicum of value for libraries at best. As an industry, we need to get as much data out of OverDrive as possible, since our libraries’ ebook/audiobook presence exists solely on their servers; but, without giving OverDrive the opportunity to turn such reports into another a la carte service.
However, if this and future Big Data reports assuage publishers’ concerns about ebooks and audiobooks in libraries, then there is definite value in this exercise; but libraries need data every bit as much as publishers in order to serve our communities as effectively as possible.

Filed under: Associations and Organizations, Companies (Publishers/Vendors), Data Files, Libraries, News, Patrons and Users, Public Libraries, Publishing, Reports

SHARE:

E-BooksMatt WeaverOverDriveStatistics

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@gmail.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. He earned his MLIS degree from Wayne State University in Detroit. Price has won several awards including the SLA Innovations in Technology Award and Alumnus of the Year from the Wayne St. University Library and Information Science Program. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

Job Zone

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Infodocket Posts

Now Available to All Readers in Illinois: Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) Partners with the University of...

UPDATE: An Announcement From the University of Chicago is Also Available: UChicago Library Expands Access to Banned Books Amid National Debate Over Censorship From a DPLA Announcement: The Digital Public ...

Invitation to Host IFLA WLIC (World Library and Information Congress) 2024 in Dubai Withdrawn

Here’s the Full Text of the IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) Statement Released Today: IFLA has been informed of the decision to withdraw the invitation to hold ...

Report: Exploring the Experiences of Canadians Accessing Alternate Format Print Materials

From Statistics Canada: In Canada, the 6.2 million persons with disabilities often experience challenges related to accessibility in their daily lives. While persons with disabilities face unique experiences and challenges ...

New Report: "Assessment of the Library of Congress's Digital Strategy"

From the Office of the Inspector General, Library of Congress: The Library’s digital planning and execution activities have resulted in numerous accomplishments. Despite these achievements, more work remains to clearly ...

A New Open Science Indicators Dataset From PLOS; Yale University Selects Clarivate to Provide Their Next Library Services...

EDUCAUSE 2023 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Holistic Student Experience Edition Missouri Kansas City Public Library Introduces a New Logo (via KCPL) Open Science The White House Office of Science & Technology ...

New Bill in New York State Assembly: re: Sale of Books Created with Generative AI

The bill linked below was posted on September 29, 2023. From the Summary: Requires online sellers of books created wholly or partially with the use of generative artificial intelligence to ...

A Banned Books Week Video Message From LeVar Burton re: Let Freedom Read Day on October 7, 2023

From the Video’s Description: Beloved reading advocate, writer, and television and film star LeVar Burton is leading this year’s Banned Books Week, which takes place October 1–7, 2023. He’s ready ...

PEN America, ALA, Children's Book Council, Leading Publishers, Teacher Groups, and Other Organizations Launch Letter-Writing Campaign to Oppose...

Here’s the Full Text of a Release From PEN America: For Banned Books Week 2023, PEN America and We Believe gathered a consortium of the nation’s leading publishers, teacher and ...

Academic Librarian Leans on Internet Archive for Access and Analysis; Op/Ed: CT Community College Libraries are Folding—Students Deserve...

Alabama Huntsville Library Disputes Alabama Political Reporter’s Evidence-Based Story on Relocating LGBTQ Books (via APR) Connecticut Op/Ed: CT Community College Libraries are Folding—Students Deserve Better (via CT Mirror) Dryad Dryad ...

Not Real News: An Associated Press Roundup of Untrue Stories Shared Widely on Social Media This Week

From the Associated Press: A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week. None of these are legit, even though they were ...

North Carolina: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Reverses Ban on Banned Books Week Events at Schools

From The Charlotte Observer: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools quickly reversed a ban Friday on Banned Books Week events planned in schools. In an email to principals Friday afternoon, a CMS spokeswoman warned ...

South Carolina State Library Leaves American Library Association (ALA), Does Not Renew Membership

From the Charleston City Paper: Librarians are learning the S.C. State Library in August quietly notified the national trade association for libraries that the state was not renewing its membership ...

ADVERTISEMENT

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER

Tweets by infoDOCKET

ADVERTISEMENT

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

Primary Sidebar

  • News
  • Reviews+
  • Technology
  • Programs+
  • Design
  • Leadership
  • People
  • COVID-19
  • Advocacy
  • Opinion
  • INFOdocket
  • Job Zone

Reviews+

  • Booklists
  • Prepub Alert
  • Book Pulse
  • Media
  • Readers' Advisory
  • Self-Published Books
  • Review Submissions
  • Review for LJ

Awards

  • Library of the Year
  • Librarian of the Year
  • Movers & Shakers 2022
  • Paralibrarian of the Year
  • Best Small Library
  • Marketer of the Year
  • All Awards Guidelines
  • Community Impact Prize

Resources

  • LJ Index/Star Libraries
  • Research
  • White Papers / Case Studies

Events & PD

  • Online Courses
  • In-Person Events
  • Virtual Events
  • Webcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Media Inquiries
  • Newsletter Sign Up
  • Submit Features/News
  • Data Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Sale
  • FAQs
  • Careers at MSI


© 2023 Library Journal. All rights reserved.


© 2022 Library Journal. All rights reserved.