SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
EXPLORE +
  • About infoDOCKET
  • Academic Libraries on LJ
  • Research on LJ
  • News on LJ
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Libraries
    • Academic Libraries
    • Government Libraries
    • National Libraries
    • Public Libraries
  • Companies (Publishers/Vendors)
    • EBSCO
    • Elsevier
    • Ex Libris
    • Frontiers
    • Gale
    • PLOS
    • Scholastic
  • New Resources
    • Dashboards
    • Data Files
    • Digital Collections
    • Digital Preservation
    • Interactive Tools
    • Maps
    • Other
    • Podcasts
    • Productivity
  • New Research
    • Conference Presentations
    • Journal Articles
    • Lecture
    • New Issue
    • Reports
  • Topics
    • Archives & Special Collections
    • Associations & Organizations
    • Awards
    • Funding
    • Interviews
    • Jobs
    • Management & Leadership
    • News
    • Patrons & Users
    • Preservation
    • Profiles
    • Publishing
    • Roundup
    • Scholarly Communications
      • Open Access

March 16, 2026 by Gary Price

Journal Article: “Studying with GenAI: Student Views on the Opportunities and Risks of GenAI in Higher Education”

March 16, 2026 by Gary Price

The article linked to below was published today by Education and Information Technologies (Springer).

Title

Studying with GenAI: Student Views on the Opportunities and Risks of GenAI in Higher Education

Authors

Elida Cena, Aideen McParland, Wilhelmiina Toivo, Blinne Dalton, Megan Mundy, Patrick A. O’Connor, Ashley E. Robertson, Maxine Swingler, Paul Wilson & Connie Duncan

Source

Education and Information Technologies (2026)
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-026-13923-3

Abstract

The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technology and the increasing sophistication of such tools have raised concerns about their impact on teaching, learning, and assessment in higher education. To gain an understanding of how students are using GenAI tools for studying and assessments, and to explore their perceptions of its benefits and challenges in higher education, this qualitative study examined the views of Psychology students from two UK universities. Six focus groups (N = 28), consisting of postgraduate psychology students and a few UG students were conducted using semi-structured interview questions to explore their experiences and attitudes toward the use of GenAI during their studies. Students reported using GenAI to summarise content, clarify complex ideas, and ease the writing process. While they recognised its value, especially for accessibility and time management, they also expressed concerns about plagiarism, reduced critical thinking, and unclear boundaries of ethical use. Many felt anxious about academic integrity due to inconsistent guidance. Notably, some students viewed AI use as ethically problematic, particularly in group work. The findings underscore the urgent need for clearer institutional policies and targeted training to promote ethical, effective engagement with GenAI in academic contexts.

Direct to Full Text Article

Filed under: Interviews, Management and Leadership, News, Profiles, Reports

SHARE:

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@gmail.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. He earned his MLIS degree from Wayne State University in Detroit. Price has won several awards including the SLA Innovations in Technology Award and Alumnus of the Year from the Wayne St. University Library and Information Science Program. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

Job Zone

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Infodocket Posts

ADVERTISEMENT

FOLLOW US ON X

Tweets by infoDOCKET

ADVERTISEMENT

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

Primary Sidebar

  • News
  • Reviews+
  • Technology
  • Programs+
  • Design
  • Leadership
  • People
  • COVID-19
  • Advocacy
  • Opinion
  • INFOdocket
  • Job Zone

Reviews+

  • Booklists
  • Prepub Alert
  • Book Pulse
  • Media
  • Readers' Advisory
  • Self-Published Books
  • Review Submissions
  • Review for LJ

Awards

  • Library of the Year
  • Librarian of the Year
  • Movers & Shakers 2022
  • Paralibrarian of the Year
  • Best Small Library
  • Marketer of the Year
  • All Awards Guidelines
  • Community Impact Prize

Resources

  • LJ Index/Star Libraries
  • Research
  • White Papers / Case Studies

Events & PD

  • Online Courses
  • In-Person Events
  • Virtual Events
  • Webcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Media Inquiries
  • Newsletter Sign Up
  • Submit Features/News
  • Data Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Sale
  • FAQs
  • Careers at MSI


© 2026 Library Journal. All rights reserved.


© 2022 Library Journal. All rights reserved.