Research Article: “Using Preprint Sources in Science News: Do Transparent Disclosures Enhance Credibility?”

The article linked below was recently published by Science Communication.

Title

Using Preprint Sources in Science News: Do Transparent Disclosures Enhance Credibility?

Authors

Chelsea L. Ratcliff
University of Georgia

Alice Fleerackers
University of Amsterdam

Rebekah Wicke
Cornell University

Andy J. King
University of Utah

Jakob D. Jensen
University of Utah

Source

Science Communication
First published online September 6, 2025

DOI: 10.1177/10755470251363

Abstract

This study tested whether the transparent use of preprint sources affects the perceived credibility of science news and scientists. In an experiment, U.S. adults read a news report describing COVID-19 research as a “preprint” (with varying levels of detail) or as simply a “study.” There were no main effects of disclosing preprint status, but indirect effects emerged. For those who noticed the disclosure, both brief and fuller depictions of a study’s preprint status enhanced the credibility of the reporting and the scientists behind the research. However, perceiving the science to be uncertain negatively mediated the effects of preprint disclosure on credibility appraisals among Republicans.

Direct to Full Text Article

Filed under: News