Journal Article: “The Role of Science in the Climate Change Discussions on Reddit”

The article linked below was published today by PLOS Climate.

Title

The Role of Science in the Climate Change Discussions on Reddit

Authors

Paolo Cornale
 ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy

Michele Tizzani
ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy

Fabio Ciulla
ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy

Kyriaki Kalimeri
ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy

Elisa Omodei
Department of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria

Daniela Paolotti
ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy

Yelena Mejova
ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy

Source

PLOS Climate (2025)

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000541

Abstract

Well-informed collective and individual action necessary to address climate change hinges on the public’s understanding of the relevant scientific findings. Social media has been a popular platform for the deliberation around climate change and the policies aimed at addressing it. Whether such deliberation is informed by scientific findings is an important step in gauging the public’s awareness of scientific resources and their latest findings. In this study, we examine the use of scientific sources in the course of 14 years of public deliberation around climate change on one of the largest social media platforms, Reddit. We find that only 4.0% of the links in the Reddit posts, and 6.5% in the comments, point to domains of scientific sources, although these rates have been increasing in the past decades. These links are dwarfed, however, by the citations of mass media, newspapers, and social media, the latter of which peaked especially during 2019–2020. Further, scientific sources are more likely to be posted by users who also post links to sources having central-left political leaning, and less so by those posting more polarized sources. Scientific sources are not often used in response to links to unreliable sources, instead, other such sources are likely to appear in their comments. This study provides the quantitative evidence of the dearth of scientific basis of the online public debate and puts it in the context of other, potentially unreliable, sources of information.

Direct to Full Text Article

Filed under: Data Files, News, Patrons and Users, PLOS