Journal Article: “The Academic Impact of Open Science: A Scoping Review”

The article linked below was published today by Royal Society Open Science.

Title

The Academic Impact of Open Science: A Scoping Review

Authors

Thomas Klebel
Open and Reproducible Research Group, Know Center Research

Vincent Traag
Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University

Ioanna Grypari
Athena Research Center

Lennart Stoy
Technopolis Group

Tony Ross-Hellauer
Open and Reproducible Research Group, Know Center Research

Source

Royal Society Open Science
12:241248
March 5, 2025

DOI:  10.1098/rsos.241248

Abstract

Open Science seeks to make research processes and outputs more accessible, transparent and inclusive, ensuring that scientific findings can be freely shared, scrutinized and built upon by researchers and others. To date, there has been no systematic synthesis of the extent to which Open Science (OS) reaches these aims. We use the PRISMA scoping review methodology to partially address this gap, scoping evidence on the academic (but not societal or economic) impacts of OS. We identify 485 studies related to all aspects of OS, including Open Access (OA), Open/FAIR Data (OFD), Open Code/Software, Open Evaluation and Citizen Science (CS). Analysing and synthesizing findings, we show that the majority of studies investigated effects of OA, CS and OFD. Key areas of impact studied are citations, quality, efficiency, equity, reuse, ethics and reproducibility, with most studies reporting positive or at least mixed impacts. However, we also identified significant unintended negative impacts, especially those regarding equity, diversity and inclusion. Overall, the main barrier to academic impact of OS is lack of skills, resources and infrastructure to effectively re-use and build on existing research. Building on this synthesis, we identify gaps within this literature and draw implications for future research and policy.

Direct to Full Text Article

Filed under: Data Files, News, Open Access