SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
EXPLORE +
  • About infoDOCKET
  • Academic Libraries on LJ
  • Research on LJ
  • News on LJ
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Libraries
    • Academic Libraries
    • Government Libraries
    • National Libraries
    • Public Libraries
  • Companies (Publishers/Vendors)
    • EBSCO
    • Elsevier
    • Ex Libris
    • Frontiers
    • Gale
    • PLOS
    • Scholastic
  • New Resources
    • Dashboards
    • Data Files
    • Digital Collections
    • Digital Preservation
    • Interactive Tools
    • Maps
    • Other
    • Podcasts
    • Productivity
  • New Research
    • Conference Presentations
    • Journal Articles
    • Lecture
    • New Issue
    • Reports
  • Topics
    • Archives & Special Collections
    • Associations & Organizations
    • Awards
    • Funding
    • Interviews
    • Jobs
    • Management & Leadership
    • News
    • Patrons & Users
    • Preservation
    • Profiles
    • Publishing
    • Roundup
    • Scholarly Communications
      • Open Access

February 10, 2025 by Gary Price

Report: “Survey Highlights an Emerging Divide Over Artificial Intelligence in the U.S.”

February 10, 2025 by Gary Price

From Rutgers University:

Results from a new Rutgers University–New Brunswick survey tracking public trust in artificial intelligence (AI) suggest a growing divide in how Americans engage with the technology.

People with higher income and education levels are more likely to use and trust AI and have greater knowledge about the technology.

The survey, part of the National AI Opinion Monitor (NAIOM), was conducted between Oct. 25 and Nov. 8 and gathered insights from nearly 4,800 respondents across demographic groups, socioeconomic status and geographic location. It examined public attitudes toward AI, including trust in AI systems, the companies using them and AI-generated news content.

When asked about their trust in AI to act in the public interest, 47% of Americans reported having “a fair amount” or “a great deal” of confidence in the technology. This level of trust was higher than that for social media (39%) or Congress (42%)

Trust in AI was highest among individuals ages 18 to 24 (60%), those earning $100,000 or more a year (62%) and graduate degree holders (60%).

[Clip]

As AI continues to shape daily life, Ognyanova emphasized the need for education to help people make informed decisions about the technology.

To measure AI knowledge, respondents were presented with eight statements about AI and asked to classify each as “accurate,” “inaccurate” or “not sure.” Three statements were correct; the rest were false. Participants were then scored based on the number of correct responses.

Respondents were categorized into three knowledge groups:

  • Low knowledge (0-2 correct answers) – 27% of respondents
  • Medium knowledge (3-4 correct answers) – 51% of respondents
  • High knowledge (5-8 correct answers) – 23% of respondents

The survey revealed a correlation between education, income and AI literacy. Among graduate degree holders, 29% demonstrated high AI knowledge, compared with 20% of those without a college degree. Twenty-seven percent of respondents earning more than $100,000 were classified as highly knowledgeable about AI, compared with 19% of those earning less than $25,000.

Direct to Full Text Report
21 pages; PDF.

Read the Complete Summary

See Also: New AI Index Study Published by the University of South Carolina College of Information and Communications (Jan. 9, 2025)

Filed under: News

SHARE:

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@gmail.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. He earned his MLIS degree from Wayne State University in Detroit. Price has won several awards including the SLA Innovations in Technology Award and Alumnus of the Year from the Wayne St. University Library and Information Science Program. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

Job Zone

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Infodocket Posts

ADVERTISEMENT

FOLLOW US ON X

Tweets by infoDOCKET

ADVERTISEMENT

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

Primary Sidebar

  • News
  • Reviews+
  • Technology
  • Programs+
  • Design
  • Leadership
  • People
  • COVID-19
  • Advocacy
  • Opinion
  • INFOdocket
  • Job Zone

Reviews+

  • Booklists
  • Prepub Alert
  • Book Pulse
  • Media
  • Readers' Advisory
  • Self-Published Books
  • Review Submissions
  • Review for LJ

Awards

  • Library of the Year
  • Librarian of the Year
  • Movers & Shakers 2022
  • Paralibrarian of the Year
  • Best Small Library
  • Marketer of the Year
  • All Awards Guidelines
  • Community Impact Prize

Resources

  • LJ Index/Star Libraries
  • Research
  • White Papers / Case Studies

Events & PD

  • Online Courses
  • In-Person Events
  • Virtual Events
  • Webcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Media Inquiries
  • Newsletter Sign Up
  • Submit Features/News
  • Data Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Sale
  • FAQs
  • Careers at MSI


© 2026 Library Journal. All rights reserved.


© 2022 Library Journal. All rights reserved.