Research Article: “We Need to Rethink the Way We Identify Diamond Open Access Journals in Quantitative Science Studies”

The article linked below was recently just accepted for publication by Quantitative Science Studies (QSS).

Title

We Need to Rethink the Way We Identify Diamond Open Access Journals in Quantitative Science Studies

Authors

Marc-André Simard
Université de Montréal

Leigh-Ann Butler
University of Ottawa

Juan Pablo Alperin
Simon Fraser University

Stefanie Haustein
University of Ottawa

Source

Quantitative Science Studies 1-6 (2024)

DOI: 10.1162/qss_c_00331

Abstract

With the announcement of several new diamond open access (OA) related initiatives and the creation of the Global Summit on Diamond Open Access, diamond OA is now at the forefront of the OA movement. However, while working on our recent Quantitative Science Studies publication and datasets, we noticed that temporarily waiving article processing charges (APCs) was a commonly used strategy by big publishers for some of their journals. In the absence of an index of diamond journals, most studies have operationalized the identification of diamond journals as a subset of gold journals that do not charge an APC. While this is a pragmatic approach, we fear that it could undermine the value of the research in understanding what we believe is more commonly understood by diamond OA. This letter discusses the need for bibliometric research to apply more nuance in how it operationalizes diamond OA beyond the absence of APCs. We call on the publishing sector to be more transparent in the costs of publishing. Ultimately, we argue that transparency and a long-term commitment to no-APC publishing are necessary for diamond OA to succeed, and that the research community needs to apply this standard when seeking to understand the model.

Direct to Access Article

Filed under: Companies (Publishers/Vendors), Data Files, News, Open Access, Publishing