The following book published by MIT Press is available online (full text, open access) as well as for purchase from MIT Press.
Martin Paul Eve
The open access edition of this book was made possible by generous funding and support from Arcadia – a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin, the Open Society Foundations, the Open Knowledge Foundation, Knowledge Unlatched, and Birkbeck, University of London.
The Open Access Movement proposes to remove price and permission barriers for accessing peer-reviewed research work—to use the power of the internet to duplicate material at an infinitesimal cost-per-copy. In this volume, contributors show that open access does not exist in a technological or policy vacuum; there are complex social, political, cultural, philosophical, and economic implications for opening research through digital technologies. The contributors examine open access from the perspectives of colonial legacies, knowledge frameworks, publics and politics, archives and digital preservation, infrastructures and platforms, and global communities. he contributors consider such topics as the perpetuation of colonial-era inequalities in research production and promulgation; the historical evolution of peer review; the problematic histories and discriminatory politics that shape our choices of what materials to preserve; the idea of scholarship as data; and resistance to the commercialization of platforms. Case studies report on such initiatives as the Making and Knowing Project, which created an openly accessible critical digital edition of a sixteenth-century French manuscript, the role of formats in Bruno Latour’s An Inquiry into Modes of Existence, and the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), a network of more than 1,200 journals from sixteen countries. Taken together, the contributions represent a substantive critical engagement with the politics, practices, infrastructures, and imaginaries of open access, suggesting alternative trajectories, values, and possible futures.
Table of Contents
- Grammatical and Terminological
- Abbreviations and Glossary
I: Colonial Influences
1: Epistemic Alienation in African Scholarly Communications: Open Access as a Pharmakon
2: Scholarly Communications and Social Justice
3: Social Justice and Inclusivity: Drivers for the Dissemination of African Scholarship
4: Can Open Scholarly Practices Redress Epistemic Injustice?
5: When the Law Advances Access to Learning: Locke and the Origins of Modern Copyright
6: How Does a Format Make a Public?
7: Peer Review: Readers in the Making of Scholarly Knowledge
8: The Making of Empirical Knowledge: Recipes, Craft, and Scholarly Communication
III: Publics and Politics
9: The Royal Society and the Noncommercial Circulation of Knowledge
10: The Political Histories of UK Public Libraries and Access to Knowledge
11: Libraries and Their Publics in the United States
12: Open Access, “Publicity,” and Democratic Knowledge
IV: Archives and Preservation
13: Libraries, Museums, and Archives as Speculative Knowledge Infrastructure
14: Preserving the Past for the Future: Whose Past? Everyone’s Future
15: Is There a Text in These Data? The Digital Humanities and Preserving the Evidence
16: Accessing the Past, or Should Archives Provide Open Access?
17: Infrastructural Experiments and the Politics of Open Access
18: The Platformization of Open https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress
19: Reading Scholarship Digitally
20: Toward Linked Open Data for Latin America
21: The Pasts, Presents, and Futures of SciELO https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11885.003.0030
VI: Global Communities
22: Not Self-Indulgence, but Self-Preservation: Open Access and the Ethics of Care
23: Toward a Global Open-Access Scholarly Communications System: A Developing Region Perspective
24: Learned Societies, Humanities Publishing, and Scholarly Communication in the UK
25: Not All Networks: Toward Open, Sustainable Research Communities