New Journal Article: “Exploring PubMed as a Reliable Resource for Scholarly Communications Services”

The following article is published in the latest issue of the Journal of the Medical Library Association.

Title

Exploring PubMed as a Reliable Resource For Scholarly Communications Services

Authors

Peace Ossom Williamson
University of Texas at Arlington

Christian I. J. Minter
University of Nebraska Medical Center

Source

Journal of the Medical Library Association
Vol 107, No 1 (2019)
DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2019.433

Abstract

Objective
PubMed’s provision of MEDLINE and other National Library of Medicine (NLM) resources has made it one of the most widely accessible biomedical resources globally. The growth of PubMed Central (PMC) and public access mandates have affected PubMed’s composition. The authors tested recent claims that content in PMC is of low quality and affects PubMed’s reliability, while exploring PubMed’s role in the current scholarly communications landscape.

Methods
The percentage of MEDLINE-indexed records was assessed in PubMed and various subsets of records from PMC. Data were retrieved via the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) interface, and follow-up interviews with a PMC external reviewer and staff at NLM were conducted.

Results
Almost all PubMed content (91%) is indexed in MEDLINE; however, since the launch of PMC, the percentage of PubMed records indexed in MEDLINE has slowly decreased. This trend is the result of an increase in PMC content from journals that are not indexed in MEDLINE and not a result of author manuscripts submitted to PMC in compliance with public access policies. Author manuscripts in PMC continue to be published in MEDLINE-indexed journals at a high rate (85%). The interviewees clarified the difference between the sources, with MEDLINE serving as a highly selective index of journals in biomedical literature and PMC serving as an open archive of quality biomedical and life sciences literature and a repository of funded research.

Conclusion
The differing scopes of PMC and MEDLINE will likely continue to affect their overlap; however, quality control exists in the maintenance and facilitation of both resources, and funding from major grantors is a major component of quality assurance in PMC.

Direct to Full Text Article ||| PDF Version (14 pages)

Direct to Complete Table of Contents (Vol 107, No 1)

Filed under: Data Files, Funding, Interviews, Libraries, National Libraries, News, Open Access, Scholarly Communications