SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
EXPLORE +
  • About infoDOCKET
  • Academic Libraries on LJ
  • Research on LJ
  • News on LJ
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Libraries
    • Academic Libraries
    • Government Libraries
    • National Libraries
    • Public Libraries
  • Companies (Publishers/Vendors)
    • EBSCO
    • Elsevier
    • Ex Libris
    • Frontiers
    • Gale
    • PLOS
    • Scholastic
  • New Resources
    • Dashboards
    • Data Files
    • Digital Collections
    • Digital Preservation
    • Interactive Tools
    • Maps
    • Other
    • Podcasts
    • Productivity
  • New Research
    • Conference Presentations
    • Journal Articles
    • Lecture
    • New Issue
    • Reports
  • Topics
    • Archives & Special Collections
    • Associations & Organizations
    • Awards
    • Funding
    • Interviews
    • Jobs
    • Management & Leadership
    • News
    • Patrons & Users
    • Preservation
    • Profiles
    • Publishing
    • Roundup
    • Scholarly Communications
      • Open Access

November 16, 2018 by Gary Price

New Report From Pew Research Looks at Public Attitudes Toward Computer Algorithms

November 16, 2018 by Gary Price

From the Pew Research Center:

The American public expresses broad concerns over the fairness and effectiveness of computer programs making important decisions in people’s lives, according to a new survey from Pew Research Center. Indeed, 58% of Americans say that computer programs will always reflect some level of human bias, compared with 40% who think these programs can be designed in a way that is bias-free.
The survey of nearly 4,600 U.S. adults presented respondents with four different real-world scenarios in which computers make decisions by collecting and analyzing large quantities of public and private data: a personal finance score used to offer consumers deals or discounts; a criminal risk assessment of people up for parole; an automated resume screening program for job applicants; and a computer-based analysis of job interviews
Overall, the public expresses broad concerns about the fairness and acceptability of using computers for decision-making in situations with important real-world consequences. For example, minorities of Americans think that the video job interview (33%) and personal finance score (32%) algorithms would be fair to job applicants and consumers, respectively. And when asked directly whether they think the use of these algorithms is acceptable, a majority of the public says that they are not.
Majorities of Americans find it unacceptable to use algorithms to make decisions with real-world consequences for humans
The survey also finds that attitudes toward algorithmic decision-making can depend on the context of those decisions and the characteristics of the people who might be affected. For instance, half (50%) of U.S. adults think that automated criminal risk scores would be fair to people who are up for parole, but just 32% think that an automated personal finance score would be fair to consumers.
And in the specific context of the algorithms that power most social media platforms, users’ comfort level with sharing their personal information also depends heavily on why that data is being used. Fully 75% of social media users say they would be comfortable sharing their data with those sites if it were used to recommend events they might like to attend. That share drops to just 37% if their data is being used to deliver messages from political campaigns.
Across age groups, social media users are comfortable with their data being used to recommend events - but wary of that data being used for political messaging
These social media users also report being exposed to a mix of positive and negative content on these sites. Fully 71% of social media users say they have seen content there that makes them angry, with 25% saying they see this sort of content frequently. Meanwhile, 58% of users say they frequently encounter posts that are overly exaggerated, while 59% frequently encounter posts in which people are making accusations or starting arguments without waiting until they have all the facts.
This report is drawn from a survey conducted as part of the American Trends Panel, a nationally representative panel of randomly selected U.S. adults living in households recruited from landline and cellphone random-digit-dial surveys. The panel, which was created by Pew Research Center, is being managed by GfK. Data in this report are drawn from the panel wave conducted May 29-June 11, 2018, among 4,594 respondents. The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 4,594 respondents is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points.
Other Key Findings:

  • As is often true of users’ experiences on social media more broadly, negative encounters are accompanied by more positive interactions. One-quarter of users (25%) say they frequently encounter content that makes them feel angry, but a comparable share (21%) says they frequently encounter content that makes them feel connected to others. And 44% report that they frequently see content that makes them amused.
  • Public attitudes towards algorithmic decision-making can vary by factors related to race and ethnicity. Just 25% of whites think the personal finance score concept would be fair to consumers, but that share rises to 45% among blacks. By the same token, 61% of blacks think the criminal risk score concept is not fair to people up for parole, but that share falls to 49% among whites.
  • Roughly three-quarters of the public (74%) thinks the content people post on social media is not reflective of how society more broadly feels about important issues. But 25% think that social media does paint an accurate portrait of society.
  • Social media users ages 18 to 29 are twice as likely to say they frequently see content on social media that makes them feel amused (54%) than see content that makes them feel angry (27%). But users age 65 and older encounter these two types of content with more comparable frequency: 30% of older users frequently see content on social media that makes them feel amused, while 24% frequently see content that makes them feel angry.port

Direct to Full Text Report ||| PDF Version (41 pages)

Filed under: Data Files, Interviews, News, Patrons and Users, Profiles, Reports

SHARE:

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@mediasourceinc.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. Before launching INFOdocket, Price and Shirl Kennedy were the founders and senior editors at ResourceShelf and DocuTicker for 10 years. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com, and is currently a contributing editor at Search Engine Land.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

Job Zone

ADVERTISEMENT

Recent Articles on LJ

Texas A&M Restructures Library Roles, Rescinds Librarian Tenure

Tour de France: A Watching, Reading, and Listening Guide | Your Home Librarian

Prince George’s County Memorial Library System Targeted by Anti-LGBTQIA+ Vandalism

After the MLIS

Delaware to Expand Statewide Telehealth Program | ALA Annual 2022

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Infodocket Posts

Journal Article: "Click Me…! The Influence of Clickbait on User Engagement in Social Media and the Role of...

The article linked below was recently published by PLoS One. Title Click Me…! The Influence of Clickbait on User Engagement in Social Media and the Role of Digital Nudging Authors ...

New Project for SPARC Europe to Reform Rights Retention and Open Licensing Policies in Europe

From SPARC Europe: SPARC Europe has been selected to deliver the first project sponsored under the Knowledge Rights 21 (KR21) programme. KR21 seeks to strengthen access to knowledge in particular through ...

Not Real News: An Associated Press Roundup of Untrue Stories Shared Widely on Social Media This Week

From the Associated Press: A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week. None of these are legit, even though they were ...

Journal Article: "Public Libraries as Community Health Partners"

The article linked below was recently published by Certified Public Manager® Applied Research Title Public Libraries as Community Health Partners Authors Melinda HodgesLibrary Director, Buda Public Library, City of Buda ...

University of Cincinnati: Lori Harris Named Interim Dean and University Librarian

From the University of Cincinnati: Lori E. Harris has been named interim dean and university librarian of the University of Cincinnati Libraries effective July 1, 2022. Harris initially joined the ...

New Research Article: "How Policies Portray Students: A Discourse Analysis of Codes of Conduct in Academic Libraries"

The article linked below appears in the July 2022 issue of College & Research Libraries. Title How Policies Portray Students: A Discourse Analysis of Codes of Conduct in Academic Libraries ...

Florida International University (FIU) Launches Open-Access Forensic Research Library

From FIU Announcement: Florida International University (FIU) has launched a first-of-its-kind resource for forensic science practitioners, students, researchers, and the general public. The Research Forensic Library provides access to thousands ...

"Book Banning and the First Amendment" (Video Recording of a Freedom Forum Event)

The video recording of Freedom Forum event about about book banning and the First Amendment was recorded at the Library of Congress on June 21, 2022. The discussion features: Suzanne ...

Educopia Partnering with Curtin University and OAPEN to Create a Community Governed OA Book Analytics Service for Publishers

From an Educopia Announcement: With more than AUD $1M in support from the Mellon Foundation, we at Educopia are excited to be working with collaborative partners at Curtin University  and ...

Just Released: U.S. Copyright Office Publishes Report on Copyright Protections For Press Publishers

From the U.S. Copyright Office: On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Copyright Office published a report titled Copyright Protections for Press Publishers. At the request of Senators Leahy, Tillis, Cornyn, ...

U.S. Census Releases 2021 Population Estimates: Nation Continues to Age as It Becomes More Diverse

From the U.S. Census: The last two decades have seen the country grow continuously older. Since 2000, the national median age – the point at which one-half the population is ...

Vision 2030: Library and Archives Canada Releases New Strategic Plan

From the LAC Website: Following two years of consultations, reflection and work, Library and Archives Canada (LAC) has unveiled its strategic plan, Vision 2030, defining the institution’s goals until 2030 ...

ADVERTISEMENT

FOLLOW INFODOCKET ON TWITTER

Tweets by @infodocket

ADVERTISEMENT

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

Primary Sidebar

  • News
  • Reviews+
  • Technology
  • Programs+
  • Design
  • Leadership
  • People
  • COVID-19
  • Advocacy
  • Opinion
  • INFOdocket
  • Job Zone

Reviews+

  • Booklists
  • Prepub Alert
  • Book Pulse
  • Media
  • Readers' Advisory
  • Self-Published Books
  • Review Submissions
  • Review for LJ

Awards

  • Library of the Year
  • Librarian of the Year
  • Movers & Shakers 2022
  • Paralibrarian of the Year
  • Best Small Library
  • Marketer of the Year
  • All Awards Guidelines
  • Community Impact Prize

Resources

  • LJ Index/Star Libraries
  • Research
  • White Papers / Case Studies

Events & PD

  • Online Courses
  • In-Person Events
  • Virtual Events
  • Webcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Media Inquiries
  • Newsletter Sign Up
  • Submit Features/News
  • Data Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Sale
  • FAQs
  • Careers at MSI


© 2022 Library Journal. All rights reserved.


© 2022 Library Journal. All rights reserved.