February 26, 2021

Report: An Updated Methodology for the Open Science Monitor

From David Osimo:

After an intense online debate and an excellent expert workshop, we — the Lisbon Council, ESADE Business School and the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University — are happy to publish a revised methodology (soon to be posted on the official European Commission website). First and foremost, this is not the final methodology. It has become clear that open science is too dynamic and too difficult to measure for a “definitive” methodology. It is rather a second interim release — and it will require continuous collaboration with the open science community in the future, also in connection with other existing efforts by OpenAire, FAIR Metrics and the European Open Science Cloud.

Of course, the main objection raised in comment period is the use of proprietary tools, such as the Scopus (or Web of Science, for that matter) database. We remain convinced that, given the current level and status of data availability, using proprietary data is a necessity in order to provide timely, relevant indicators. Hopefully, once the European Open Science Cloud is fully deployed, indicators will be automatically produced from open data sources — but it is not the case today.

Read the Complete Post

Direct to Updated Methodological Note

Direct to Open Science Monitor Website

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@mediasourceinc.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. Before launching INFOdocket, Price and Shirl Kennedy were the founders and senior editors at ResourceShelf and DocuTicker for 10 years. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com, and is currently a contributing editor at Search Engine Land.

Share