Blog Post: “Plan S – Response To Alternatives Proposed by Kamerlin et al.”

From an Innovations in Scholarly Communication Blog Post by Bianca Kramer and Jeroen Bosman (Utrech University Library):

The recent substantial critique* by a group of mainly chemistry researchers to Plan S has garnered a lot of discussion on Twitter and in blogposts (e.g. Plan S, Antwort auf die Kritik), mostly around the risks the authors associate with the implementation of Plan S in its current form. The authors, in their well-thought-out piece, also include four solutions as alternatives to Plan S, and these have as yet, to our knowledge, not been given as much attention they deserve. To further the healthy debate around both Plan S and alternative (existing) options for open access, we hereby provide our point-by-point response to the four scenarios sketched by the authors (below in cursive) and how we feel they relate to the goals and methods as proposed in plan S.

Read the Complete Blog Post
See Also: Response to Plan S from Academic Researchers: Unethical, Too Risky! (via For Better Science)
 

Filed under: Academic Libraries, Libraries, News, Open Access