July 19, 2018

Research Article: “Author-Level Metrics in the New Academic Profile Platforms: The Online Behaviour of the Bibliometrics Community” (Preprint)

Note: The following full text article (accepted for publication manuscript version) was recently shared by the authors on arXiv.

Title

Author-Level Metrics in the New Academic Profile Platforms: The Online Behaviour of the Bibliometrics Community

Authors

Alberto Martín-Martín
Universidad de Granada, Spain

Enrique Orduna-Malea
Universitat Politècnica de València

Emilio Delgado López-Cózar
Universidad de Granada, Spain

Source

via arXiv
Accepted for Publication in Journal of Infometrics Version

Final Version Available via Journal of Infometrics (Vol. 12 No.2; 2018)

Abstract

The new web-based academic communication platforms do not only enable researchers to better advertise their academic outputs, making them more visible than ever before, but they also provide a wide supply of metrics to help authors better understand the impact their work is making.

This study has three objectives: a) to analyse the uptake of some of the most popular platforms (Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley and Twitter) by a specific scientific community (bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics, and altmetrics); b) to compare the metrics available from each platform; and c) to determine the meaning of all these new metrics.

To do this, the data available in these platforms about a sample of 811 authors (researchers in bibliometrics for whom a public profile Google Scholar Citations was found) were extracted. A total of 31 metrics were analysed.

The results show that a high number of the analysed researchers only had a profile in Google Scholar Citations (159), or only in Google Scholar Citations and ResearchGate (142). Lastly, we find two kinds of metrics of online impact. First, metrics related to connectivity (followers), and second, all metrics associated to academic impact. This second group can further be divided into usage metrics (reads, views), and citation metrics. The results suggest that Google Scholar Citations is the source that provides more comprehensive citation-related data, whereas Twitter stands out in connectivity-related metrics.

Direct to Full Text Article (26 pages; PDF)

Gary Price About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@mediasourceinc.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. Before launching INFOdocket, Price and Shirl Kennedy were the founders and senior editors at ResourceShelf and DocuTicker for 10 years. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com, and is currently a contributing editor at Search Engine Land.

Share