June 18, 2021

New Research Article: “Allegation of Scientific Misconduct Increases Twitter Attention (Preprint)

The following preprint was recently shared by the authors on arXiv.

Title

Allegation of Scientific Misconduct Increases Twitter Attention

Authors

Lutz Bornmann
Max Planck Society

Robin Haunschild
Max Planck Society

Source

via arXiv

Abstract

The web-based microblogging system Twitter is a very popular altmetrics source for measuring the broader impact of science. In this case study, we demonstrate how problematic the use of Twitter data for research evaluation can be, even though the aspiration of measurement is degraded from impact to attention measurement. We collected the Twitter data for the paper published by Yamamizu et al. (2017). An investigative committee found that the main figures in the paper are fraudulent.

Direct to Full Text Article (Preprint)
6 pages; PDF.

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@mediasourceinc.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. Before launching INFOdocket, Price and Shirl Kennedy were the founders and senior editors at ResourceShelf and DocuTicker for 10 years. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com, and is currently a contributing editor at Search Engine Land.

Share