Libraries Promise to Destroy User Data to Avoid Threat of Government Surveillance
From The Guardian:
Now, the page reads: “Sometimes the law requires us to share your information, such as if we receive a valid subpoena, warrant, or court order. We may share your information if our careful review leads us to believe that the law, including state privacy law applicable to Library Records, requires us to do so.”
Read the Complete Article
Comment by Gary Price, Founder/Editor of infoDOCKET.
Good to see what’s reported here. HOWEVER, what are libraries doing to make sure vendors also have strong (or strengthen) current privacy policies? What are libraries doing to CLEARLY disclose these issues to users?
In the Internet age libraries are not insular organizations. Our data and the data that users generate just doesn’t sit on our servers in our libraries.
One example? Sure. It’s one we’ve mentioned many times on infoDOCKET during the past several years.
Are libraries (in the U.S.) that provide ebooks to users (via OverDrive) CLEARLY disclosing that when a user borrows a book and places the book on their Kindle the borrow record is stored (along with any notes made in the ebook) in perpetuity on Amazon’s servers UNLESS the library user manually removes the record/data?
This issue could be solved with a simple disclaimer/explanation appearing every x months when a user selects a book to place on their Kindle device along with instructions on how to remove the material from the Amazon server if so desired.
About Gary Price
Gary Price (firstname.lastname@example.org) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. Before launching INFOdocket, Price and Shirl Kennedy were the founders and senior editors at ResourceShelf and DocuTicker for 10 years. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com, and is currently a contributing editor at Search Engine Land.