SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
EXPLORE +
  • About infoDOCKET
  • Academic Libraries on LJ
  • Research on LJ
  • News on LJ
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Libraries
    • Academic Libraries
    • Government Libraries
    • National Libraries
    • Public Libraries
  • Companies (Publishers/Vendors)
    • EBSCO
    • Elsevier
    • Ex Libris
    • Frontiers
    • Gale
    • PLOS
    • Scholastic
  • New Resources
    • Dashboards
    • Data Files
    • Digital Collections
    • Digital Preservation
    • Interactive Tools
    • Maps
    • Other
    • Podcasts
    • Productivity
  • New Research
    • Conference Presentations
    • Journal Articles
    • Lecture
    • New Issue
    • Reports
  • Topics
    • Archives & Special Collections
    • Associations & Organizations
    • Awards
    • Funding
    • Interviews
    • Jobs
    • Management & Leadership
    • News
    • Patrons & Users
    • Preservation
    • Profiles
    • Publishing
    • Roundup
    • Scholarly Communications
      • Open Access

July 7, 2016 by Gary Price

Only 25% of U. of California Faculty Depositing Research Articles in Open Access Repository

July 7, 2016 by Gary Price

From The Chronicle of Higher Education:

Three summers ago advocates of open-access publishing scored a major victory when the University of California’s Academic Senate voted to make research articles produced by faculty members across the 10-campus system freely available.
Now that big win looks less than overwhelming.
Despite the faculty vote, only about 25 percent of professors systemwide are putting their papers into a state-created repository that allows free outside access. The majority, said Christopher M. Kelty, a professor of information studies and anthropology at the University of California at Los Angeles who helped lead the open-access effort, appear indifferent. “They don’t know about it, they don’t really care about it,” Mr. Kelty said. “They publish their work, and they just go on doing what they do.”

Read the Complete Article
Quick Comment by Gary Price, infoDOCKET Founder/Editor:
Weren’t libraries and librarians supposed to be a key part of the marketing and sales force for oa concepts, tools, services, and “how to” advice?
Hopefully, things will change at U. of California and at many other institutions where I’ve heard less than impressive deposit rates.
However, at this point, is all of this another example of libraries/librarians being very poor at marketing/selling something we believe to be important?
Library/librarian marketing and sales skills are all over the place. Some strong and effective and others, well, not so impressive. In some cases, library marketing/sales could be made more effective if there was a unified plan and message across the entire community vs. a single institution or even a group of institutions. Are we consulting experts to help us build a marketing/advertising/sales plan? By the way, I realize that all of this is easier said than done.
OR
in the case of open access, have we done enough effective marketing/selling and academics just don’t care, not interested, etc?
Finally, it would be interesting to learn if U. of California academics are depositing their papers and other materials in repositories that do not have a direct relationship to the university? This would go to the idea of possible confusion, lack of time, effort, etc.

Filed under: Journal Articles, Libraries, News, Open Access, Publishing

SHARE:

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@gmail.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. He earned his MLIS degree from Wayne State University in Detroit. Price has won several awards including the SLA Innovations in Technology Award and Alumnus of the Year from the Wayne St. University Library and Information Science Program. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

Job Zone

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Infodocket Posts

ADVERTISEMENT

FOLLOW US ON X

Tweets by infoDOCKET

ADVERTISEMENT

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

Primary Sidebar

  • News
  • Reviews+
  • Technology
  • Programs+
  • Design
  • Leadership
  • People
  • COVID-19
  • Advocacy
  • Opinion
  • INFOdocket
  • Job Zone

Reviews+

  • Booklists
  • Prepub Alert
  • Book Pulse
  • Media
  • Readers' Advisory
  • Self-Published Books
  • Review Submissions
  • Review for LJ

Awards

  • Library of the Year
  • Librarian of the Year
  • Movers & Shakers 2022
  • Paralibrarian of the Year
  • Best Small Library
  • Marketer of the Year
  • All Awards Guidelines
  • Community Impact Prize

Resources

  • LJ Index/Star Libraries
  • Research
  • White Papers / Case Studies

Events & PD

  • Online Courses
  • In-Person Events
  • Virtual Events
  • Webcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Media Inquiries
  • Newsletter Sign Up
  • Submit Features/News
  • Data Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Sale
  • FAQs
  • Careers at MSI


© 2026 Library Journal. All rights reserved.


© 2022 Library Journal. All rights reserved.