SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
EXPLORE +
  • About infoDOCKET
  • Academic Libraries on LJ
  • Research on LJ
  • News on LJ
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Libraries
    • Academic Libraries
    • Government Libraries
    • National Libraries
    • Public Libraries
  • Companies (Publishers/Vendors)
    • EBSCO
    • Elsevier
    • Ex Libris
    • Frontiers
    • Gale
    • PLOS
    • Scholastic
  • New Resources
    • Dashboards
    • Data Files
    • Digital Collections
    • Digital Preservation
    • Interactive Tools
    • Maps
    • Other
    • Podcasts
    • Productivity
  • New Research
    • Conference Presentations
    • Journal Articles
    • Lecture
    • New Issue
    • Reports
  • Topics
    • Archives & Special Collections
    • Associations & Organizations
    • Awards
    • Funding
    • Interviews
    • Jobs
    • Management & Leadership
    • News
    • Patrons & Users
    • Preservation
    • Profiles
    • Publishing
    • Roundup
    • Scholarly Communications
      • Open Access

June 6, 2013 by Gary Price

Roundup: Feds Have Direct Access to User Data From Google, Facebook, Yahoo, and Others

June 6, 2013 by Gary Price

Last night (Wed), news broke that Verizon has been providing the U.S. government access to phone records (metadata) from Verizon.
This afternoon the ALA shared their views on Verizon story.

Internet Data Providers and the NSA

Tonight, reports from The Guardian (they broke the Verizon story) and the Washington Post about the NSA (National Security Agency) having direct access to user data via the servers of Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Microsoft, and others via a secret project named PRISM.
From The Guardian:

The National Security Agency has obtained direct access to the systems of Google, Facebook, Apple and other US internet giants, according to a top secret document obtained by the Guardian.
[Clip]
The NSA access is part of a previously undisclosed program called PRISM, which allows officials to collect material including search history, the content of emails, file transfers and live chats, the document says.
[Clip]
Although the presentation claims the program is run with the assistance of the companies, all those who responded to a Guardian request for comment on Thursday denied knowledge of any such program.
In a statement, Google said: “Google cares deeply about the security of our users’ data. We disclose user data to government in accordance with the law, and we review all such requests carefully. From time to time, people allege that we have created a government ‘back door’ into our systems, but Google does not have a back door for the government to access private user data.”
[Clip]
Some of the world’s largest internet brands are claimed to be part of the information-sharing program since its introduction in 2007. Microsoft – which is currently running an advertising campaign with the slogan “Your privacy is our priority” – was the first, with collection beginning in December 2007.

From The Washington Post:

The technology companies, which participate knowingly in PRISM operations, include most of the dominant global players of Silicon Valley. They are listed on a roster that bears their logos in order of entry into the program: “Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, Apple.” PalTalk, although much smaller, has hosted significant traffic during the Arab Spring and in the ongoing Syrian civil war.
[Clip]
Analysts who use the system from a Web portal at Fort Meade key in “selectors,” or search terms, that are designed to produce at least 51 percent confidence in a target’s “foreignness.” That is not a very stringent test. Training materials obtained by the Post instruct new analysts to submit accidentally collected U.S. content for a quarterly report, “but it’s nothing to worry about.”
[Clip]
Firsthand experience with these systems, and horror at their capabilities, is what drove a career intelligence officer to provide PowerPoint slides about PRISM and supporting materials to The Washington Post in order to expose what he believes to be a gross intrusion on privacy. “They quite literally can watch your ideas form as you type,” the officer said.

The Washington Post article says that direct access by the NSA to Dropbox material is “coming soon.”
See Also: Slides from the Presentation Mentioned in Both Articles (via WAPO)
See Also: US Secretly Mines Data From Internet Companies
From CNBC:

NBC News has confirmed from two sources that the PRISM program exists, but a government official says it is a data collection program rather than a data mining program.

Also includes brief comments from Apple and Facebook
UPDATES from June 9, 2013

  • Reference: Timeline of Surveillance (via Washington Post)
  • U.S., company officials: Internet surveillance does not indiscriminately mine data (via Washington Post)
  • NSA Statement and “Fact Sheet” about Boundless Informat (via NSA)
  • Yahoo and Prism (“The Claims are False”) by Ron Bell, General Counsel, Yahoo

UPDATES from June 8, 2013

  • Boundless Informant: the NSA’s secret tool to track global surveillance data (via The Guardian)
  • New Prism Slide Released by The Guardian
  • Tech Companies Concede to Surveillance Program (via NY Times)
  • No evidence of NSA’s ‘direct access’ to tech companies (via CNET)
  • Solving the mystery of PRISM (via The Week)
  • Denials in surveillance program require decoding (via AP)
  • Domestic Spying Q&A (via AP)

UPDATES from June 7, 2013

  • ALA calls for national dialogue to reform the nation’s surveillance laws
  • Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Responds to PRISM Reports
  • Google CEO Larry Page Responds to PRISM Reports
  • EPIC Sends Letter to Congress: ‘NSA Domestic Surveillance Program is Unlawful’
  • Obama: ‘Nobody is listening to your telephone calls’ – live updates (via The Guardian)
  • U.S. Confirms That It Gathers Online Data Overseas (via NY Times)
  • U.S. Collects Vast Data Trove (via WSJ)
    Note: Points out that credit card data is also being captured.  

Updates from June 6, 2013

  • Comments From Two Experts on NSA (via Quartz)
  • PM Directorate of National Intelligence Statement on Report 
  • PRISM scandal: tech giants flatly deny allowing NSA direct access to servers (via The Guardian)

Senior officials with knowledge of the situation within the tech giants admitted to being confused by the NSA revelations, and said if such data collection was taking place, it was without companies’ knowledge.
Executives said they were “confused” by the NSA claims. “We operate under what we are required to do by law,” said one. “We receive requests for information all the time. Say about a potential terrorist threat or after the Boston bombing. But we have systems in place for that.” The executive claimed, as did others, that the most senior figures in their organisation had never heard of PRISM or any scheme like it.

We plan to update this post as more info becomes available.

Filed under: Associations and Organizations, Data Files, News, Patrons and Users, Reports, Roundup, Video Recordings

SHARE:

lj

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@gmail.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. He earned his MLIS degree from Wayne State University in Detroit. Price has won several awards including the SLA Innovations in Technology Award and Alumnus of the Year from the Wayne St. University Library and Information Science Program. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

Job Zone

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Infodocket Posts

ADVERTISEMENT

FOLLOW US ON X

Tweets by infoDOCKET

ADVERTISEMENT

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

Primary Sidebar

  • News
  • Reviews+
  • Technology
  • Programs+
  • Design
  • Leadership
  • People
  • COVID-19
  • Advocacy
  • Opinion
  • INFOdocket
  • Job Zone

Reviews+

  • Booklists
  • Prepub Alert
  • Book Pulse
  • Media
  • Readers' Advisory
  • Self-Published Books
  • Review Submissions
  • Review for LJ

Awards

  • Library of the Year
  • Librarian of the Year
  • Movers & Shakers 2022
  • Paralibrarian of the Year
  • Best Small Library
  • Marketer of the Year
  • All Awards Guidelines
  • Community Impact Prize

Resources

  • LJ Index/Star Libraries
  • Research
  • White Papers / Case Studies

Events & PD

  • Online Courses
  • In-Person Events
  • Virtual Events
  • Webcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Media Inquiries
  • Newsletter Sign Up
  • Submit Features/News
  • Data Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Sale
  • FAQs
  • Careers at MSI


© 2026 Library Journal. All rights reserved.


© 2022 Library Journal. All rights reserved.