SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
EXPLORE +
  • About infoDOCKET
  • Academic Libraries on LJ
  • Research on LJ
  • News on LJ
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Libraries
    • Academic Libraries
    • Government Libraries
    • National Libraries
    • Public Libraries
  • Companies (Publishers/Vendors)
    • EBSCO
    • Elsevier
    • Ex Libris
    • Frontiers
    • Gale
    • PLOS
    • Scholastic
  • New Resources
    • Dashboards
    • Data Files
    • Digital Collections
    • Digital Preservation
    • Interactive Tools
    • Maps
    • Other
    • Podcasts
    • Productivity
  • New Research
    • Conference Presentations
    • Journal Articles
    • Lecture
    • New Issue
    • Reports
  • Topics
    • Archives & Special Collections
    • Associations & Organizations
    • Awards
    • Funding
    • Interviews
    • Jobs
    • Management & Leadership
    • News
    • Patrons & Users
    • Preservation
    • Profiles
    • Publishing
    • Roundup
    • Scholarly Communications
      • Open Access

July 8, 2015 by Gary Price

New Research Article: “Web for Wearables: Lessons Learned from Google Glass”

July 8, 2015 by Gary Price

The following paper by researchers in Australia was recently made available online.
It appears a version of Google Glass might be on the way for enterprise/workplace usage.
Title
Web for Wearables: Lessons Learned from Google Glass
Authors

Jagmohan Chauhan
UNSW (University of New South Wales) & NICTA (National ICT Australia)
Mohamed Ali Kaafar
NICTA
Anirban Mahanti
NICTA
Source
via arXiv
Abstract
This paper presents a first look at some of the challenges associated with enabling a seamless web experience on Optical Head Mounted Display wearables such as Google Glass from the perspective of web content providers, client device, and the network.
We conducted experiments to study the impact of choosing the application layer protocol (e.g., HTTP vs HTTPS) and of individual web components on the performance of Glass browser, by measuring webpage load time, temperature variation and power consumption and compare it to a smartphone.
Our findings suggest that (a) performance of Glass compared to a smartphone in terms of total power consumption and webpage load time deteriorates with increasing number of web objects, number of servers accessed and number of JavaScripts on a webpage, (b) execution time for popular JavaScript benchmarks is about 3 to 8 times higher on Glass compared to a smartphone, (c) popular 3rd party analytics and ad scripts on Glass takes about 2x more time to execute than a smartphone (d) WebP is an energy efficient image format compared to JPEG and PNG on Glass, (e) cost of HTTPS on Glass compared to a smartphone increases with increasing number of web objects, webpage size and the number of servers accessed on a webpage, and (f) seven out of 50 websites studied in this paper are providing better wearable web experience by specifically serving fewer or smaller images, fewer JavaScripts, fewer CSS and no ads to Glass than a smartphone.
Direct to Full Text Article (Preprint; 8 pages; PDF)
See Also: The Google Glass Project: What did we learn? (via ZDNet)

Filed under: Journal Articles, News

SHARE:

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@gmail.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. He earned his MLIS degree from Wayne State University in Detroit. Price has won several awards including the SLA Innovations in Technology Award and Alumnus of the Year from the Wayne St. University Library and Information Science Program. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

Job Zone

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Infodocket Posts

ADVERTISEMENT

FOLLOW US ON X

Tweets by infoDOCKET

ADVERTISEMENT

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

This coverage is free for all visitors. Your support makes this possible.

Primary Sidebar

  • News
  • Reviews+
  • Technology
  • Programs+
  • Design
  • Leadership
  • People
  • COVID-19
  • Advocacy
  • Opinion
  • INFOdocket
  • Job Zone

Reviews+

  • Booklists
  • Prepub Alert
  • Book Pulse
  • Media
  • Readers' Advisory
  • Self-Published Books
  • Review Submissions
  • Review for LJ

Awards

  • Library of the Year
  • Librarian of the Year
  • Movers & Shakers 2022
  • Paralibrarian of the Year
  • Best Small Library
  • Marketer of the Year
  • All Awards Guidelines
  • Community Impact Prize

Resources

  • LJ Index/Star Libraries
  • Research
  • White Papers / Case Studies

Events & PD

  • Online Courses
  • In-Person Events
  • Virtual Events
  • Webcasts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Media Inquiries
  • Newsletter Sign Up
  • Submit Features/News
  • Data Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Sale
  • FAQs
  • Careers at MSI


© 2026 Library Journal. All rights reserved.


© 2022 Library Journal. All rights reserved.