Note: infoDOCKET would once again like to thank the team at SAGE for opening up their paywall and allowing infoDOCKET to provide free, full text access to a journal article linked to below.
This article was recently made available via the SAGE OnlineFirst program and will appear in print in an upcoming issue of the Journal of Information Science.
Simply click the link below and you’ll be taken direct to the full text. The article will be available for free via the URL below for the next month.
National Research Council, Italy
Juliana E Raffaghelli
Open University of Catalonia, Spain
Journal of Information Science
Article First Published Online October 4, 2020
Open research data (ORD) have been considered a driver of scientific transparency. However, data friction, as the phenomenon of data underutilisation for several causes, has also been pointed out. A factor often called into question for ORD low usage is the quality of the ORD and associated metadata. This work aims to illustrate the use of ORD, published by the Figshare scientific repository, concerning their scientific discipline, their type and compared with the quality of their metadata. Considering all the Figshare resources and carrying out a programmatic quality assessment of their metadata, our analysis highlighted two aspects. First, irrespective of the scientific domain considered, most ORD are under-used, but with exceptional cases which concentrate most researchers’ attention. Second, there was no evidence that the use of ORD is associated with good metadata publishing practices. These two findings opened to a reflection about the potential causes of such data friction.
Direct to Full Text Article (Free)