December 10, 2019

New Report: “Open Access Potential and Uptake in the Context of Plan S – A Partial Gap Analysis”

Bianca Kramer and Jeroen Bosman from the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands and proprietors of the “Innovations in Scholarly Communication” blog have published a new partial gap analysis of Plan S.

The analysis was commissioned on behalf of the Dutch Research Council (NWO), a member of cOAlition S.

From the Innovations in Scholarly Communications Blog:

Today we released the report Open access potential and uptake in the context of Plan S – a partial gap analysis, which aims to provide cOAlition S with initial quantitative and descriptive data on the availability and usage of various open access options in different fields and subdisciplines, and, as far as possible, their compliance with Plan S requirements.

The reports builds on the work described in two of our 2018 posts: Towards a Plan S gap analysis? (1) Open access potential across disciplines and Towards a Plan S gap analysis? (2) Gold open access journals in WoS and DOAJ.

Read the Complete Blog Post/Report (Including Main Results)

Direct to Dataset: Open Access Potential and Uptake in the Context of Plan S – A Partial Gap Analysis

Direct to Statement from Plan S: “Gaps Report Highlights Why Plan S is Needed”

Gary Price About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@mediasourceinc.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. Before launching INFOdocket, Price and Shirl Kennedy were the founders and senior editors at ResourceShelf and DocuTicker for 10 years. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com, and is currently a contributing editor at Search Engine Land.

Share