The following article (preprint) was recently shared on arXiv.
Title
Authors
Yongjun Zhu
Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea
Erjia Yan
Drexel University
Silvio Peroni
University of Bologna
Chao Che
Dalian University, China
Source
via arXiv
Abstract
Books have been widely used to share information and contribute to human knowledge. However, the quantitative use of books as a method of scholarly communication is relatively unexamined compared to journal articles and conference papers. This study uses the COCI dataset (a comprehensive open citation dataset provided by OpenCitations) to explore books’ roles in scholarly communication. The COCI data we analyzed includes 445,826,118 citations from 46,534,705 bibliographic entities.
By analyzing such a large amount of data, we provide a thorough, multifaceted understanding of books. Among the investigated factors are 1) temporal changes to book citations; 2) book citation distributions; 3) years to citation peak; 4) citation half-life; and 5) characteristics of the most-cited books. Results show that books have received less than 4% of total citations, and have been cited mainly by journal articles.
Moreover, 97.96% of books have been cited fewer than 10 times. Books take longer than other bibliographic materials to reach peak citation levels, yet are cited for the same duration as journal articles. Most-cited books tend to cover general (yet essential) topics, theories, and technological concepts in mathematics and statistics.
Direct to Full Text Article (Preprint)
16 pages; PDF.
About Gary Price
