February 25, 2021

Preprint: “Few Open Access Journals are Plan S Compliant”

UPDATE January 31, 2019 (Added Media Coverage): “Few Open-Access Journals Meet Requirements Of Plan S, Study Says” (via Science)


End Update

The following preprint was recently shared on Preprints.org.

Title

Few Open Access Journals are Plan S Compliant

Authors

Jan Erik Frantsvåg
The Arctic University of Norway: Tromsø

Tormod Eismann Strømme
University of Bergen

Source
Preprints 2019, 2019010165
DOI: 10.20944/preprints201901.0165.v1

Much of the debate on Plan S seems to concentrate on how to make toll access journals open access, taking for granted that existing open access journals are Plan S compliant. We suspected this was not so, and set out to explore this using DOAJ’s journal metadata. We conclude that an overwhelmingly large majority of open access journals are not Plan S compliant, and that it is small HSS publishers not charging APCs that are least compliant and will face major challenges with becoming compliant. Plan S need to give special considerations to smaller publishers and/or non-APC-based journals.

Direct to Full Text Article (Preprint)

About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@mediasourceinc.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. Before launching INFOdocket, Price and Shirl Kennedy were the founders and senior editors at ResourceShelf and DocuTicker for 10 years. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com, and is currently a contributing editor at Search Engine Land.

Share