Research Article: Prevalence and Citation Advantage of Gold Open Access in the Subject Areas of the Scopus Database (Preprint)

The following preprint was recently shared on arXiv.
Title
Prevalence And Citation Advantage Of Gold Open Access (Preprint)
Authors
Pablo Dorta-González
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Yolanda Santana-Jiménez
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Source
via arXiv
Abstract

The potential benefit of open access (OA) in relation to citation impact has been discussed in the literature in depth. The methodology used to test the OA citation advantage includes comparing OA vs. non-OA journal impact factors and citations of OA versus non-OA articles published in the same non-OA journals. However, one problem with many studies is that they are small -restricted to a discipline or set of journals-. Moreover, conclusions are not entirely consistent among research areas and ‘early view’ and ‘selection bias’ have been suggested as possible explications. In the present paper, an analysis of gold OA from across all areas of research -the 27 subject areas of the Scopus database- is realized. As a novel contribution, this paper takes a journal-level approach to assessing the OA citation advantage, whereas many others take a paper-level approach. Data were obtained from Scimago Lab, sorted using Scopus database, and tagged as OA/non-OA using the DOAJ list. Jointly with the OA citation advantage, the OA prevalence as well as the differences between access t./ypes (OA vs. non-OA) in production and referencing are tested. A total of 3,737 OA journals (16.8%) and 18,485 non-OA journals (83.2%) published in 2015 are considered. As the main conclusion, there is no generalizable gold OA citation advantage at journal level.

Direct to Full Text Article (Preprint)
31 pages; PDF.

Filed under: Data Files, Journal Articles, News, Open Access