The list was published by The Scientist and written by Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus the co-founders of Retraction Watch.
From the Introduction:
This year, stories about scientific retractions were dominated by big numbers—60 at once in one case, 120 in one fell swoop in another—as well as the eyebrow-raising practice of researchers submitting fake peer reviews, often ones they themselves had written.
Direct to Direct to Top List
Hat Tip and Thanks: Shirl Kennedy at FullTextReports.com
Another resource that you should know about and visit.
About Gary Price
