Government agencies would have to get a warrant or court order to obtain customers’ reading records from bookstores and online booksellers, under a bill approved by the state Senate.
[Clip]
The bill, SB602, passed the Senate unanimously and without debate Monday. It now goes to the Assembly.[Clip]
There was no registered opposition.
From an ACLU Announcement (Link to Follow ASAP):
Today, the California State Senate unanimously approved the Reader Privacy Act of 2011 – legislation that would require government agencies to seek a warrant in order to access consumers’ reading records from bookstores and online retailers. The bill – SB 602 authored by Senator Leland Yee (D-San Francisco) – would establish consumer protections for book purchases similar to long-established privacy laws for library records.
“I am very pleased that both Democrats and Republicans agree that current law is completely inadequate when it comes to protecting one’s privacy for book purchases, especially for online shopping and electronic books,” said Yee. “Individuals should be free to buy books without fear of government intrusion and witch hunts. If law enforcement has reason to suspect wrongdoing, they can obtain a warrant for such information.”
Many bookstores already collect information about readers and their purchases. Digital book services can collect even more detailed information including which books are browsed, how long each page is viewed, and even digital notes made in the margins.
Historically, sensitive reader information has come under fire. During the McCarthy hearings of the 1950s, Americans were questioned about whether they had read Marx or Lenin. In the years following September 11, 2001, the FBI sought patron information from more than 200 libraries.
Just this past year, Amazon was asked by the North Carolina Department of Revenue to turn over 50 million purchase records including books, videos, and other expressive material.
SB 602 will update California state law to ensure that government and third parties cannot demand access to Californians’ reading records without proper justification.
Yee’s law is supported by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Google, Consumer Federation of California, and Californians Aware, among others.
Supporters say that it is essential for state law to keep pace and safeguard readers in the digital age. Electronic or digital books now outsell paperbacks on Amazon.com and over 18 million e-readers are expected to be sold in 2012.
“California should be a leader in ensuring that upgraded technology does not mean downgraded privacy,” said Valerie Small Navarro, Legislative Advocate with the ACLU’s California Affiliates. “We should be able to read about anything from politics, to religion to health without worrying that the government might be looking over our shoulder.”
“In a recent Google Books decision, the court noted the importance of the privacy concerns with digital books,” said Cindy Cohn, Legal Director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “This law will ensure that the enhanced reader tracking that is possible through digital books and book services doesn’t create a honey pot for government investigators and other lawyers seeking to snoop on what we search for, browse and read in digital bookstores and libraries.”
Hat Tip: J. Warren
About Gary Price
