October 17, 2017

New Preprint: “Anticipated Effects of an Open Access Policy at a Private Foundation”

The following preprint was recently posted on bioRxiv.

Title

Anticipated Effects of an Open Access Policy at a Private Foundation

Authors

Eesha Khare

Carly Strasser
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Source

via bioRxiv
https://doi.org/10.1101/128413

Note

Title on bioRxiv entry is: “Anticipated effects of an open access policy at a private foundation”
Title on article PDF: “Expected effects of an open access policy at a private foundation”

Abstract

The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF) was interested in understanding the potential effects of a policy requiring open access to peer-reviewed publications resulting from the research the foundation funds. To explore this question, we collected data on more than 2000 publications in over 500 journals that were generated by GBMF grantees since 2001. We then examined the journal policies to establish how two possible open access policies might have affected grantee publishing habits. We found that 99.3% of the articles published by grantees would have complied with a policy that requires open access within 12 months of publication. We also estimated the annual costs to GBMF for covering fees associated with “gold open access” to be between $250,000 and $2,500,000 annually.

Direct to Full Text Article (7 pages; PDF)

Direct to Dataset (via Zenodo)

Gary Price About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@mediasourceinc.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. Before launching INFOdocket, Price and Shirl Kennedy were the founders and senior editors at ResourceShelf and DocuTicker for 10 years. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com, and is currently a contributing editor at Search Engine Land.

Share