December 14, 2017

Research Assessment/Metrics: “The Leiden Manifesto Under Review: What Libraries Can Learn From It” (Journal Preprint)

The following preprint is being made available by LIBER (Association of European Research Libraries). The article has been accepted for publication and is scheduled for publication in Digital Library Perspectives.

Title

The Leiden Manifesto Under Review: What Libraries Can Learn From It (Preprint; 2017)

Authors

S. K. Coombs
Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands

I. Peters
Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, Germany

Source

LIBER Website

Abstract

This paper is a critical discussion of the Leiden Manifesto for libraries already engaged in
bibliometric practices.

It offers practical recommendations based on the work of the Association of European Research Libraries (LIBER) Working Group on Metrics.

This work is in the beginning phase and summarizes literature on the topic as well as the experiences of the members of the orking Group. The discussion reflects today’s growing popularity of (quantitative) research assessment which is seen in enthusiasts introducing new metrics (i.e. altmetrics) and by critics demanding responsible metrics that increase objectivity and equity in evaluations.

Direct to Full Text Article (Preprint)
14 pages; PDF.

See Also: Leiden Manifesto Website/Documents

See Also: LIBER Working Group of Metrics Website

See Also: Update from LIBER’s Metrics Working Group

See Also: Indiana University Bloomington Faculty Council Adopts Policy on Responsible Metrics (via LMRM Blog)

Gary Price About Gary Price

Gary Price (gprice@mediasourceinc.com) is a librarian, writer, consultant, and frequent conference speaker based in the Washington D.C. metro area. Before launching INFOdocket, Price and Shirl Kennedy were the founders and senior editors at ResourceShelf and DocuTicker for 10 years. From 2006-2009 he was Director of Online Information Services at Ask.com, and is currently a contributing editor at Search Engine Land.

Share